RECOGNIZING THE MIRACLE OF THE MINDFUL TURNS OF SKIING

“Every day we are engaged in a miracle that we don’t even recognize: the blue sky, the white clouds, the green leaves, and the curious eyes of a child. All is a miracle.
“When we walk we’re not walking alone. Our parents and ancestors are walking with us. They’re present in every cell of our bodies. So each step that brings us healing and happiness also brings healing and happiness to our parents and ancestors. Every mindful step has the power to transform us and all our ancestors within us, including our animal, plant and mineral ancestors. We don’t walk for ourselves alone. When we walk, we walk for our family and for the whole world.”
Thich Nhat Hanh “At Home in the World”

Many skiers are familiar with the Buddhist monk Thich Nhat Hahn because of his writing and activism during the Viet Nam war, but the majority of skiers are not practitioners of Buddhism or familiar with the value it places on what is termed ‘a skilled mind.’ A basic Buddhism guide describes such capable awareness: “Essentially, according to Buddhist teachings, the ethical and moral principles are governed by examining whether a certain action, whether connected to body or speech is likely to be harmful to one’s self or to others and thereby avoiding any actions which are likely to be harmful. In Buddhism, there is much talk of a skilled mind. A mind that is skilful avoids actions that are likely to cause suffering or remorse.” It may be a stretch for some to conflate the deliberate, well-placed step of walking with the faster movement of controlling the slide down a snow-covered slope on a pair of skis as equally mindful tools of healing, happiness and transformation for the whole world, but it is a stretch I am willing and obliged to make. More people walk than ski but we all carry our ancestors within, and the necessary control of the arc of the turn is as personally powerful as the placement of the foot and requires the same mindful attention to the present moment. Those who may posit that the act of skiing carries a greater inherent risk than that of walking have a point worth considering, but as a lifetime skier I am far less likely to encounter or cause harm skiing any slope I choose to ski than I would be on a leisurely walk alone in certain neighborhoods of any large city on earth, and, alas, most smaller cities and towns. That said, there are all too many skiers and walkers with unskilled minds, dangerously and obliviously unaware that they do not move alone on the paths and slopes of the world.
Each of us carries and is engaged with the miracle of sky, clouds, leaves, parents, children, ancestors, animals, plants and minerals of Earth with every breath and step we take and every turn we make—for ourselves, our family and the whole world. Every skier who has ever lived knows instinctively if not always intellectually that the act of skiing is transformative, but not every skier appreciates that none of us ski by or for ourselves alone. Stop alongside any blue, green, black or black diamond ski run in the country and observe the action, and I am confident you will notice a surprising number of skiers who seem oblivious to the skiers around them as more than impediments to the arc of their turn, completely unaware of the ancestors carried within. Perhaps you have literally encountered one of them. If so, I hope you both came away from the meeting unharmed, transformed and more mindful rather than in need of physical, emotional and karmic healing.
Common sense and modern science assures us that we do indeed carry our parents and ancestors within us. I like the idea which makes sense that engaging in action that brings healing and happiness to ourselves includes our parents and ancestors, and not just those connected by direct genetics as all things and every person are connected. Those for whom skiing is a major factor of life do not question the importance of engaging in it with a skilled mind.
Mindful skiers are aware that the miracle of skiing as we know it is unraveling in many different though connected ways. One indicator as obvious as and directly connected to the blue sky and white clouds is that in the last 40 years the average annual snowpack in the Western United States has dropped by 41% with a consequent shrinkage of 34 skiable days. This trend is expected to continue so that in 50 years the mountains of today’s Western American ski resorts will be brown in February. Ski resorts around the world are closing because of lack of reliable snow. Another thread in the fabric of the undoing of skiing is the economic reality of recent decades that fewer and fewer citizens of the world can afford to ski, and the rate of new skiers entering the sport is declining. The inequality of the world’s economic reality (especially in the United States), the diminishing snowpack and the subtle changes in the blue sky and white clouds and the unequivocal environmental crises are as interconnected as the parents, children, ancestors, animals, plants and minerals of Earth. These same dynamics are evident everywhere on Earth and all signs are that they will only increase, not diminish. That is, the untying of the miracle of the Earth’s environment and the inequality of its human economy are as woven together as all our ancestors and, it needs emphasizing, descendants.
Our parents and ancestors are walking and skiing with us, and so are all our descendants, including our plant, animal and mineral ones. Humans with unskilled minds have for far too long treated the Earth as commodity and market rather than cornucopia and miracle, and the consequences of such greed based carelessness are obvious everywhere on earth and do not need more description. It is going to get worse and humans are not going to heal the Earth. In the process of healing itself it is possible and very likely probable that the Earth will rid itself of humans, and there’s not a damn thing we can do about it.
What we can do for ourselves is take each step and make every turn on skis with a skillful mind bringing healing and happiness to each of us and all our ancestors in the present moment. And if that’s all we can do, why not do it?

THE ANTHROPOCENTRIC ANTHROPOCENE SHAM/SCAM

“If all mankind were to disappear, the world would regenerate back to the rich state of equilibrium that existed ten thousand years ago. If insects were to vanish, the environment would collapse into chaos.”
Edward O. Wilson

“I don’t like formal gardens. I like wild nature. It’s just the wilderness instinct in me, I guess.”
Walt Disney

People whose wilderness instincts haven’t been ground into pabulum by the daily grind and who still know and acknowledge the differences between a forest and a tree farm, a meadow and a lawn, a river with and without dams and the relative values of long-term environmental health and short-term profits, also know that homo sapiens is a part of nature, the ecology and the web of life of Planet Earth. As E.O. Wilson succinctly points out, mankind is neither master of life on earth nor essential to its existence. Members of our species who are incognizant of this reality are, at best, deluded. Words are insufficient to describe those who appear incognizant but in reality are not. Among the many precious, irreplaceable treasures of life, including clear air, clean water, life sustaining seas, mountain glaciers, healthy soil, jungles, forests and democratic economy already being sacrificed to their delusions and addiction to greed are the quality and security of the lives of your grandchildren and mine.
That pisses me off. In my view it should piss off everyone at a deep gut level. Every human, with or without grandchildren, is inextricably connected to everything that lives past, present and future and every individual thought, word, action, inaction and standard of integrity affects the whole. I wish for my grandchildren the best of healthy, vibrant, engaged lives guided by wilderness instincts and compassion. Anthropogenic global warming climate change deniers and other adherents of/participants in the anthropocentric anthropocene sham/scam (AASS) don’t give a shit about your grandchildren or mine or about the other irreplaceable treasures of life. Deniers are the 21st century’s mental/emotional/spiritual/ethical descendants of European Medieval inquisitors of the middle ages and the perpetrators of the Salem Witch Trials of 17th century America. These people, literally, do not think twice about sacrificing the living and the unborn to the status quo of dead and discredited superstitions. The AASS’s standards of honesty, intelligence, morality, ethics and compassion are perhaps best exemplified at this writing by Donald Trump and a few years ago Dick Cheney, who was happy to take time out from justifying his better known wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to serve as point man in AASS’s war on reality and scientific consensus.
It’s been 500 years since the inquisition placed Galileo Galilei under house arrest for the rest of his life for the ‘heresy’ of publishing his accurate scientific observations. Galileo, honored today as the “Father” of modern observational astronomy, physics and modern science, observed, among other things, that the Earth moved around the Sun and could not be the center of the universe. This reality was in conflict with “the” church’s dogma that the sun moved around the Earth which was the center of the universe. Galileo’s observations also threatened the anthropocentric delusions about mankind’s place in that universe on which “the” church thrived. The good news in the obtuse, cruel violence of the inquisition is that Galileo got off easy, relatively speaking. The bad news is that anthropocentric craziness is alive and well in the modern world.
500 years later AASS has replaced the inquisition with something more sophisticated and amorphous but just as brutal, stupid, parasitic and destructive to the best potential of mankind and the ecological health of the Earth.
Anthropocentrism is the fallacious idea that human beings are the center of the universe and the most significant creature on Earth. E.O. Wilson puts that self-absorbed idea in perspective.
Officially, the majority of scientists agree that earth is currently in the Holocene (meaning ‘recent whole’) marking the period since the last ice age nearly 12,000 years ago. The so-called Anthropocene is a proposed term for the present geological epoch since the Industrial Revolution in the 18th century began to impact the climate and ecosystems of Earth. As such, it is a recognition of the destructive influence humans have had and a backhanded, unintended denial of the deniers, but as currently used it conflates the power of destruction with the gift of creation All of the older and more traditional ‘cenes’, as in Holo, Plio, Oligo and Paleo, took millions of years to form, but the anthropocene sham/scammers don’t have millions of years. 300 years is plenty of time to build an AASS cene for those whose quarterly profit reports, particularly from those extractive/polluting/poisoning industries too well known to need listing, are the center of their universe. Irony weeps.
AASSers have embraced the famous anthropocentric quip/quote by Stewart Brand “We are as gods and might as well get good at it.” (Which he later updated to what might be termed the AASS motto: “We are as gods and have to get good at it.”) But a simple deconstruction of Brand’s flippant if tempting solution to, for instance, human caused global climate change reveals it to be a shameless/shameful sham/scam. “We are as gods” is anthropocentrism at its most deluded and dangerous. The natural world, the environment, wilderness and the wild existed on earth for millions of years before human beings appeared. The very concept of God or gods is a recent human invention, a projection of the human mind no one has ever seen and which is a very different reality from the creation of a blade of grass which everyone has seen. “We” cannot create so much as a blade of grass, though since inquisition times we have discovered how to better destroy, genetically modify, domesticate and turn blades of grass (temporarily) into vassals instead of members of the biotic community of the web of life, their rightful place.
We are not as Gods any more than we are as Martians, and we cannot get good at being whatever it is that gods do as we cannot get good at living on Mars. And it is telling that some AASSers are already talking about colonizing Mars after our reign of being as gods on Earth has ended. Details about our future on Mars haven’t been worked out, but we are as good at pretending that details don’t matter as we are not at being as gods.
AASSers cloak themselves in a green mantle synthetically dyed by such organizations as The Nature Conservancy that consistently and oxymoronically insist that nature is dead and gone and that they are protecting nature by the very science and economic policies and dogmas that are killing it. It is worth remembering that the Koch brothers have given millions of dollars to The Nature Conservancy, and the many mantles covering the Koch brothers are the green of money not of grass.
The Anthropocentric Anthropocene Sham/Scam and its supporters like Trump, Cheney, the Kochs, the Nature Conservancy and others less well known have allowed greed, dogma, superstition and hubris to blind them to what Lau Tzu pointed out more than 2500 years ago:

“As for those who would take the whole world
To tinker as they see fit,
I observe that they never succeed:
For the world is a sacred vessel
Not made to be altered by man.
The tinker will spoil it;
Usurpers will lose it.”

Don’t lose it. Keep your wilderness instincts along with the world. Even if you don’t care about them, your grandchildren will. Just ask Greta Thunberg.

ACTING YOUR AGE AT 80 IN THE BACKCOUNTRY ALONE

“We don’t stop playing because we grow old. We grow old because we stop playing.”
George Bernard Shaw

“The secret of a good old age is simply an honorable pact with solitude.”
Gabriel Garcia Marquez

In 1981 at the age of 42 I embarked on a week-long solo ski tour in California’s Sierra Nevada, a remarkable and beautiful experience which has served me well. This from the essay about that tour in my book “The Perfect Turn” describes my thoughts at the end of the first solitary day in fine mountains and snow: “The last words in my notebook that night: ‘It is extremely beautiful and peaceful here. How do I get so far away from this feeling when I’m in civilization?’
“That question alone is worth the trip.
“Another question: What is the answer worth?’”
Having lived almost as long since that solo ski tour and writing those words as I had before it, I still don’t have a definitive answer but the question has inspired a few observations, reflections and life directions. First of all, alone is not lonesome in the backcountry as it sometimes can be in what is called ‘civilization.’ And, the answer is not worth losing your life, though, as every backcountry skier knows or at least should know, the search for it could and can and, for some, will end lives. That awareness is part of the beauty, peace, wild and wilderness of the backcountry that reminds us, among other things, to be wary of civilization’s hubristic veneer of guarantees. On the 2nd night of that tour I jotted in my journal: “I haven’t spoken a word since yesterday except a tight-spot grunt and a loud squawk when I fell once. Unlike Don Juan, I haven’t mastered turning off the internal dialogue other than on rare, special times. My mind goes into the past and then jumps ahead to a possible future, and when it stays in the present it enjoys itself. My mind right now is out to enjoy, not necessarily excel, though certain standards will be maintained out of pride. And today I noticed that every decision was not made by me alone. ‘We’ made the decisions. ‘We’ is here. Being alone in this state is never lonely.
“Colors and lights change continuously. White, grey, blue and then orange and gold. There is wind and an occasional airplane. I keep thinking I hear a large engine or generator, but it must only be the sound of my own head.
“That night a coyote called for a long time and I woke. Stars filled the black sky and the snow sparkled.”
Nearly 40 years later my moment by moment awareness and pleasure in recent backcountry solo ski experiences has been better than ever (or at least so it seems to my old mind), the standards and pride in excelling have plummeted (how could they not?) and the soloing is no longer a personal choice but is usually my only option if I want to play on skis in the backcountry. Those plummeting physical capabilities inescapably affect the technical standards and capabilities on skis. While I am able to keep up with some backcountry companions on descents, I can only keep up with a few possessing gargantuan amounts of patience, kindness and time on the ascents. For some reason, those few are usually unavailable after one day, sometimes after one run. I don’t blame them, but it limits my options and expands my thinking about beauty and peace—-and ego—-in the backcountry and elsewhere. I am 81 this winter and am forced to contemplate (and deal with) the reality that backcountry experience at my convenience is going to be solo. Something about those decade birthdays encourages serious contemplation of the organic reality only hinted at by the abstract science of mathematics. To paraphrase Gertrude Stein: 80 are 80 are 80.
I have skied for 70 years all around the world, the majority of those uncountable miles of pleasure and thrills attained with the aid of ski lifts. That is, I have never been among those ‘earn your turns’ puritans who ridicule the effortless ride up and disdain riders as lower class citizens of the ski world. I have always been an alpine skier who dabbled as a Nordic skier and even a ski jumper in competitive days, while the backcountry, even what is now sometimes called ‘side country,’ was never my first skiing priority. However, I do admit that as a longtime ski instructor (both legally within the system and underground) I had a few wealthy clients who hired me to accompany them helicopter skiing, and after my first week at CMH I determined that if I were wealthy I would spend 10 or 12 weeks a year living there and skiing every day. Alas, I was and am not in that economic bracket. Still, the backcountry, some of it accessed with sno-cats and helicopters, has long been a significant aspect of my skiing life, but I also earned a lot of puritan turns and miles over the ski touring years. In 1970 I was one of a group of six on an early attempt to ski from the summit of Denali. Four of the party reached the summit, but had to leave their skis far below. Doug Tompkins and I were stopped well below the top by severe high altitude sickness (HAPE and HACE), and I consider myself lucky in two ways: I got home alive, and one of my all time best mountain memories is Doug and I retreating off Denali with our skis beneath our feet (if not our tails between our legs) telemarking down the Kahiltna Glacier with 80 lb. packs in beautiful powder snow and clear, cold weather. But in many ways the longest and best was in 1975 when we did a 200 mile tour from the southern end of Wyoming’s Wind River Range to Jackson Hole. There have been lots of tours of various lengths, but it never crossed my mind to compete in any of those torture-fest randonnee uphill/downhill races on a pair of skis. Still, I always felt strong and proficient enough to be confident of getting up and back down anything I chose to ski.
That erroneous (hubristic?) perception changed quickly in 2001 when I was 62. I had a magazine assignment to write about a gathering of fine skiers, including Daron Rahlves, Danielle Crist, Reggie Crist and Zach Crist, to heli-ski in Haines, Alaska which has some of the best skiing and steep extreme lines on earth. Support crew included Pete Patterson, one of America’s great ski racers and mountain man extraordinaire; Roger Crist the father of Reggie, Danielle and Zach; Gerry Moffatt the well-known Scotsman climber/skier/kayaker/writer/photographer/bon vivant/philosopher; and Greg Von Doersten (GVD) a fine skier/climber and mountain photographer. Haines is at sea level on the Gulf of Alaska at the north end of the Inside Passage and the combination of northern latitude temperatures, low elevations and sea level atmosphere causes the wet snows of Haines (and other Alaska sites) to stick to cliffs that would not hold snow at lower latitudes or higher elevations more distant from seas. The original plan was to ski bigger mountains away from town at higher elevations and more spectacular scenery, but the weather kept us hunkered down in rainy Haines for several days until time and financial constraints limited our options from plan B to C to D. When weather cleared we went immediately to the close to town cliffs that would not hold snow at higher elevations. My job was to observe, stay out of the way of the cameras, gather material for my story, post daily updates on the magazine’s website and, of course, a few turns of my own. I had been a speed skier and had skied a few steep lines in earlier times, but Haines introduced me to a new concept of steep including new basics…..like making two turns before moving to a new line so the sluffs from the two turns don’t knock you down so you fall rather than control the descent to the bottom of the cliff, and then making two more turns and quickly moving to a new fall line, over and over and over. One morning in the company of Roger Crist, an old friend the same age as me, and Danielle the helicopter dropped us off on the spine of a ridge that dropped more than a thousand feet on both sides of the steepest skiing I have ever seen, imagined, or will ever again ski. The helicopter backed off so the photographers aboard could film the stars and senior guides skiing outrageous lines down beautiful cliffs, and so they did. We—Roger, Danielle and I—were left on top with a guide we later determined was not among the most experienced to make our way down. (Danielle, unlike me and Roger, was completely capable of skiing steep lines with her brothers, but sluffs of chauvinism rolled down the magazine’s pages before they could be turned, burying her skiing skills and depositing her with the two elders.) We dutifully followed the guide a short, steep way to a small ridge between two lines where he stopped. He instructed us to ski the line to the right, one at a time, while he was going to ski the line to the left. He said he’d see us at the bottom and took off.
As a long time climbing guide and ski instructor, I was more than surprised the guide would tell us to ski one line and he another, but we had bigger and more immediate issues to ponder. I had (and have) never stood on skis on a slope so steep and to say that I was scared shitless is an injustice to organic shit. It was bad. Just above the bottom of the thousand feet slope we were to ski was an open crevasse, a covered possible crossing on the left side of it. It seemed a lot further than a thousand feet away. Danielle went first, skiing with elegant care and precision and made it down with no mistakes. Roger went next. He was slow and steady and seemed okay until halfway down he made a mistake and took one of those falls no skier wants and never forgets. He was tumbling (literally) towards the crevasse and managed to stop just before dropping in. He was uninjured if shaken. Then it was my turn. My attention must have been complete as I made it down without mishap, but it was neither enjoyable nor satisfying. It was not a success but only a run of survival. Later that day we watched Zach take a 600 foot fall down the aptly named “Tomahawk” run. He was beat up a bit but had no serious injuries.
I wrote in my journal from the perspective of a 62 year old lifetime skier: “The energy spent on this is enormous, a revealing display of the contrived adventure documentary. These films are not documentaries about adventure; they are adventures conceived, orchestrated and made to fit into the limitations of the film. This is not adventure in the classic sense. It is a business (entertainment business) that is more interesting than being a lawyer or selling paint or stocks. The thought occurs to me that because of its very nature it is more dangerous and prone to bad judgment calls than more traditional adventure situations. Where the focus is fitting the situation into the film instead of making the film conform to the situation many things can go wrong. When the situation is inherently dangerous, this scenario is one that needs constant monitoring.”
I am reminded of Susan Sontag’s astute observation: “Photography implies that we know about the world if we accept it as the camera records it. But this is the opposite of understanding, which starts from not accepting the world as it looks. All possibility of understanding is rooted in the ability to say ‘no’”.
The day after leaving Haines we received word that our friend Hans Saari, one of the finest extreme skiers in the world had been killed after falling down the Gervasutti Couloir in Chamonix. The Haines experience and Hans’ death combined to illuminate ever-present perils of the backcountry and the personal reality of being past 60 and no longer that which I once was, or at least thought I was.
Still, through my sixties I had some fine backcountry ski adventures, including using skis to climb part way up and ski back down both Mt. Kennedy (13,944 feet) and Mt. Steele (16,644 feet) in Canada’s Yukon. There were many fine day and overnight ski tours in the Sierra, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming Argentina and France, including some beautiful solo day trips in which consciously adapting to the day’s feelings of strength and proficiency kept the experiences enjoyable and nutritious.
And then came the 70s, another of the decade birthdays. The first couple of years were not too bad, but by the mid-70s back country skiing was just one of many aspects of the physical life that were showing my age. I continued to make backcountry ski excursions without a partner, but more and more of them were in places like History Rock and Mt. Ellis near Bozeman and Durrance Peak and Titus Ridge near Sun Valley where there are always plenty of other skiers within shouting distance. A few true solo tours were as spooky as they were satisfying, and when finished I felt like I’d gotten away with something more than accomplishing anything besides a good workout. That is, alone in the backcountry was starting to feel lonesome. And then last Christmas at the age of 79 I went with my partner Jeannie Wall and our friend Kim Hall for a couple of nights into the Woody Creek Cabin a couple miles outside Cooke City, Montana where there was lots of snow and fine skiing. It is an understatement to say Jeannie and Kim are far stronger and faster than me, and I seldom saw them except in the parking lot and at the cabin.
The track into Woody Creek was well trod and by the time I reached the cabin Jeannie and Kim had the fire going, water melted, cabin warm and hors d’oeuvres prepared. Backcountry luxury at its best. For the next two days we’d get up, build a fire, breakfast and then Jeannie and Kim would leave for a larger adventure and I’d tidy up the cabin and putter around the woods close to the cabin on moderate slopes until I’d had a good workout and enough good turns. On the last morning we agreed on a time to meet at the parking lot and Jeannie and Kim left for a morning’s adventure. I cleaned up the cabin, shoveled the porch (it was snowing 6 to 12 inches each night), chopped enough firewood for the next guests and locked up the cabin. It was minus 10 F which contributed to an instinctive change of plan to just take my time getting to the parking lot instead of a short tour before. The track from Woody Creek to Cooke City is gentle, easy skiing, but I kept skins on my skis in order to slow the descent, acutely aware that a fall and broken ankle in the lonesome woods of the Beartooth Mountains in minus 10 F temperatures could be really ugly. When I reached the parking lot I was far more fatigued than expected and was happy for the feeling of survival and missing that of success.
For my 80th birthday gift to myself I took solo backcountry ski touring off the list of options, except, maybe, every now and then in places like History Rock or Mt. Ellis.
I am reminded of this from Leonard Cohen’s beautiful “Anthem”:

“Ring the bells that still can ring
Forget your perfect offering
There is a crack, a crack in everything
That’s how the light gets in.”

One needs to pay attention to the crack in everything and then to be able to look into the light.

A TALE OF TWO CITIES

THE SISTER CITIES OF SUN VALLEY, IDAHO AND KITZBUHEL, AUSTRIA
(Published with photos in the Winter 2019/2020 edition of Sun Valley Magazine here https://sunvalleymag.com/articles/tale-of-two-cities/

It is well known that Sun Valley, Idaho and Austria have been connected since before Sun Valley was born. In 1935 Averell Harriman, Chairman of Union Pacific Railroad and an avid skier, hired his skiing friend Austrian Count Felix Schaffgotsch to ride his trains around the mountains of western America in search of the perfect location for a great American destination ski resort. He stipulated, “…find an area where the powder is dry, the sun shines all day, and the harsh winds of winter don’t penetrate.” And Harriman stipulated that the resort had to be on or close to the Union Pacific line. After several weeks of searching the Count heard about the small mining community of Ketchum, Idaho at the end of a Union Pacific spur. He arrived and quickly wired Harriman, “This combines more delightful features than any place I have ever seen in Switzerland, Austria or the U.S. for a winter resort.” Within eight months Harriman had bought 4,300 acres of ranch land east of Ketchum from the Heiss family, built the Sun Valley Lodge, installed ski lifts and opened the Sun Valley Resort in time for the 1936 ski season. The rest is history, a significant part of it determined by Adolf Hitler, Nazi Germany and the approach of WWII, a dynamic familiar to ski historians but less so to today’s general skiing public. In my view, this latter point deserves more discussion than it receives. Even before the Anschluss by which Germany ‘annexed’ Austria in 1938, Hans Hauser, an Austrian, was the first ski school director in Sun Valley. Anschluss means ‘connection’ and that one caused many of the best skiers of Austria to flee their home country and immigrate to America. Many of them were young men who had spent their lives skiing. Two of the most famous Austrian skiers to immigrate to America were Hannes Schneider and Sigi Engl, and they were both enormous influences on the development of American skiing and ski resorts. That is, immigrants fleeing tyranny in their homeland have long proved to be significant assets to America, as evidenced by the history of American skiing and the community and culture of Sun Valley, Idaho. Engl, who was from Kitzbuhel, was one of the great ski racers of his time, winning Kitzbuhel’s Hahnenkahm and the Austrian National Championships twice. He was also a fine and popular instructor who immigrated to America in 1937 to teach skiing at Badger Pass in Yosemite before moving to Sun Valley in 1939. He was Director of the Sun Valley Ski School from 1952 until 1972. Engl was responsible for bringing some of the best skiers/instructors of his hometown, 5355. 43 miles away, to Sun Valley. They include:
Christian Pravda, World Champion and one of the greatest ski racers in history. His son, Chris, is still a member of the ski school.
Konrad Staudinger was a member of Austria’s 1956 Olympic Ice Hockey Team. After the Olympics he moved to Sun Valley and was one of the most popular members of the ski school for 50 years before retiring and moving back to Kitzbuhel in 2008. He still visits Sun Valley once a year.
Rainer Kolb, though born in East Germany, moved to Kitzbuhel as a child and learned to ski, race and teach there and was director of the Sun Valley Ski School from 1974 until 1999. He was also producer of Sun Valley’s Ice Show.
Hans Thum moved from Kitzbuhel to Sun Valley more than 50 years ago and is still working on the ski school. His son, Hannes, graduated from the Sun Valley Community School in 2003 and returned in 2009 as a science teacher and trip leader for the school’s Outdoor Program.
Other Kitzbuhelers who have worked on the ski school include Heinz Achhorner, Karl Beznoska, Rudi Erler, Peter Erler and Heiner Koch.
In 1967 Sun Valley and Kitzbuhel officially became sister cities.
According to the Sisters Cities website, “The U.S. Sister Cities movement was founded on September 11, 1956 at a White House Conference on Citizen Diplomacy led by U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower who described its purpose as “…to help build the road to an enduring peace” and “work out not one method but thousands of methods by which people can gradually learn a little bit more of each other.” Originally part of People to People and then the National League of Cities (NLC), Sister Cities International (SCI) became a separate, non-profit corporation in 1967. Today, SCI is the nation’s foremost citizen diplomacy movement with more than 2,300 communities participating in 130 countries. Appropriately enough, since the movement was inspired by a great WWII military leader who knew more about the true costs of war and the true values of peace than most, Sun Valley’s other sister city is Yamanouchi, Japan.

END

INTENTION

(From an unpublished book)

The Four Vows
Sentient beings are numberless, I vow to save them.
Desires are inexhaustible, I vow to put an end to them.
The Dharmas are boundless, I vow to master them.
The Buddha Way is unsurpassable, I vow to attain it.

The Four Noble Truths
1. Life is suffering.
2. The cause of suffering is desire.
3. The cessation of suffering is attainable.
4. The path to the end of suffering is the eightfold noble path.

The Eightfold Noble Path
Right View, Right Intention (WISDOM), Right Speech, Right Action, Right Livelihood (ETHICAL CONDUCT), Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, Right Concentration (MENTAL DEVELOPMENT)

The Four Vows, The Four Noble Truths, The Eighfold Noble Path are connected and intertwined, and each of us in every home and town and Buddhist community in the world is at all times acting on and influenced by each other. Whether it is literally valid or whether we can comprehend its exact dynamics “The Butterfly Effect”—the idea that a butterfly flapping its wings in Brazil will cause a tornado in Texas—is an apt description of a Buddhist understanding of how the world works, what karma is, and why mindful, personal practice is so important. The smallest greedy action, the careless word spoken in anger and the unexamined thought can and have caused more suffering in the world than a tornado in Texas. And a kind thought or action can alleviate just as much suffering. How we understand, practice, examine and conduct our lives according to the four vows, the four truths and the eightfold noble path matters—to ourselves, to our families and friends, to the community and to the world. We sit because that is the heart of the Buddhist path and intention lights up that path.
Everything is connected, any work we do in one part affects the others and we can begin anywhere. The second step of the eightfold path, right intention, is a good place to enter and take stock of our practice because intention is a volitional act. Intention is the mental energy that controls action. We may not always be able to see things as they are, which is the definition of right view (and both the beginning and end of the path), but we can always, with some effort, patience and self-awareness, examine our true intentions.
Intention in Buddhism is the commitment to consciously work on ethical and mental self-improvement by examining one’s own intentions and private relationship with and progress along the path. I know a person who hasn’t started but wants to learn about Buddhist meditation in order to deal with personal anxiety. Buddha vowed to sit under the Bodhi tree until he got it right, until he experienced enlightenment and had, so to speak, right view. The intentions of the two might seem to be worlds (kalpas) apart, but they are not; both are manifestations of the intention to reduce suffering in the world.
The three types of right intention are 1.) To resist desire; 2.) To resist anger and aversion; and 3.) To resist thinking or acting cruelly, violently or aggressively; to develop compassion.
Intention is the most powerful and important of all mental activity. The intention to live according to the four vows, the four noble truths and the eightfold path is based on seeing and understanding ourselves and the world as they are. It is not based on a projection of how we would like things to be. True intention is the pursuit of clarity. The well meaning (sometimes) intention of pursuing how we would like things to be is the work of ego sustaining our illusions. Right intention begins with asking: Why do you desire something? Why do you need to acquire something you don’t have? Why do you hope for anything to be different than it already is?
The answers we each find are steps along the path and cut away illusion along the way, step by step.

ALLEN GINSBERG SPEAKS FROM THE GRAVE

A new collection of Allen Ginsberg’s work, “Wait Till I’m Dead” Uncollected Poems, has recently been published. Not surprisingly, it’s wonderful. The first poem in the book is titled “Rep Gordon Canfield (Mine Own Dear Congressman).” It was written in 1942 and published in Columbia Jester in 1943. It reads:

“Canfield votes like a
Typical politician,
Guided strictly by
November Intuition.
For Canfield is
But half a man–
The other half
Republican”

Almost 80 years later only the names of typical politicians have changed.
HAPPY HALLOWEEN!

THE FUTURE FACE OF MONEY: a column written in 2015 with an update

Question: What do George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Alexander Hamilton, Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant, Benjamin Franklin, William McKinley, Grover Cleveland, James Madison, Salmon P. Chase and Woodrow Wilson have in common?
Answer: Their images are on all U.S paper currency. George is on the $1 bill and Woodrow on the $100,000 bill. The others, on bills between $1 and $100,000, are also white males. No African-American, Native American, Asian American or Hispanic image is found on American currency.
There are no females represented on the paper currency of the U.S., though Susan B. Anthony is on dollar coins minted between 1979 and 1981, Sacagawea on those minted from 1999 to the present and Eunice Kennedy Shriver is on a special commemorative silver dollar.
That could change. In recognition (and celebration) of the 100th anniversary in 2020 of women’s suffrage a grass roots movement hopes to change the future face of money by replacing Andrew Jackson with a female on the $20 bill. The organization spearheading the move is called “Women on 20s” (W20) and the first thing one see on their website is “W20: THE ELEMENTS OF EQUALITY.”
One also sees:
“The year 2020 marks the 100th anniversary of the passage of the 19th Amendment that granted women the right to vote. So it seems fitting to commemorate that milestone by voting to elevate women to a place that is today reserved exclusively for the men who shaped American history. That place is on our paper money. And that new portrait can become a symbol of greater changes to come.
“Let’s make the names of female ‘disrupters’ the ones who led the way and dared to think differently as well-known as their male counterparts. In the process, maybe it will get a little easier to see the way to full political, social and economic equality for women. And hopefully it won’t take another century to realize the motto inscribed on our money: E pluribus unum, or ‘Out of many, one.’”
W20 started with a large list of American women who have contributed significantly to America’s history, culture and morality. More than a quarter million people voted for their favorite candidates until the list is down to four candidates: Eleanor Roosevelt (1884-1962), Harriet Tubman (1822-1913), Rosa Parks (1913-2005) and Wilma Mankiller (1945-2010). Everyone is welcome to vote for one of the four candidates to replace Andrew Jackson on the $20 simply by going to the W20 website. You can also find compelling reasons why Jackson, who is generally viewed by Native American people and nicknamed “Indian Killer” as the very worst of all U.S. Presidents, should be replaced.
When a winner is determined W20 will petition President Obama, who has said “…it is a pretty good idea” to put more images of women on U.S. currency,” to make the change. Go to W20 and cast your vote.
I voted for Rosa Parks for many reasons including remembering when she finally had enough of inequality and took a stand, or, rather, kept her seat on a Montgomery, Alabama bus and later said of herself, “I would like to be remembered as a person who wanted to be free…so other people would also be free.”
Me too.
Wouldn’t you?

(Update on old column) Well…..Rosa didn’t win, Harriet did, but before the future face of money could arrive the title of very worst of all U.S. Presidents was transferred from Jackson to Trump who promptly hung a portrait of Jackson in his White House office. Then the worst President in history had one of his munchkins, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, announce that “for technical reasons” the note would be delayed for six years, despite the reality that all the technical work on the bill had already been done under the Obama administration. As we all know, anything that was ok with Obama is not ok with Trump, including having the image of a black woman replace a white male racist on the U.S. $20 bill.
So it stands at this writing.
Some fun protest is available. Go to Etsy.com and get a Tubman stamp and you can stamp all your $20 bills with the image of Harriet over the old image of Jackson. It’s great fun to spend those bills and see the reaction of people when they notice Harriet instead of Andrew gazing back at them. Most but not all of the reactions are positive, and both are educational for everyone involved.

THE HIDDEN VIOLENCE OF STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE

A newspaper column published in January 2001

“Not only do most people accept violence if it is perpetuated by legitimate authority, they also regard violence against certain kinds of people as inherently legitimate, no matter who commits it.” Edgar Z. Friedenberg
“It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of non-violence to cover impotence.” Mohandas K. Gandhi
On the highways of America — even in sparsely populated Blaine County — police use racial profiling to determine which automobiles to pull over and search for drugs.
Few American males in the company of other males go a day without a disparaging sexist joke, story, comment or expletive entering their conversation, even among the unusually well educated population of the Wood River Valley.
We (humans) consider a “sustainable” relationship with nature one in which there will always be enough resources for every human being, a perspective which respects nature only in terms of what nature can offer mankind, not on its own terms or in consideration of nature’s own needs.
Between 1951 and 1963 the U. S. government detonated 126 above ground atomic bombs into the atmosphere above the southern Nevada Atomic Test Site. Every one of the pink clouds that drifted with the winds (mostly into southern Utah, but actually over most of America) from the blast sites contained levels of radiation comparable to the amount released after the 1986 accidental explosion of the Soviet nuclear reactor at Chernobyl. That’s 126 times Chernobyl, and not one of them an accident.
African American women are twice as likely to die from breast cancer as European American women because of inferior medical care.
The normal workings of America’s economic institutions ensure that poor people have significantly increased risks for cancer, heart disease, AIDS, depression, environmental threats and premature death.
Our use of the automobile involves the acceptance of 50,000 deaths a year on the roads of America.
We live in a patriarchal society, which has institutionalized the dominance of men over women.
In our society aging is viewed as a “problem” whose solution is largely solved through institutionalizing the problem in isolation wards for the old, though they have picturesque names to mask their true function.
The preceding are examples of what is known as “structural violence,” a mostly hidden, mostly unacknowledged form of violence having to do with the everyday, normal functioning of institutions and policies of society. “Cultural violence” is closely related and is sometimes indistinguishable and equally hidden. It includes racism, sexism, homophobia and the devaluation of particular groups and cultures of people. “Direct violence” is any deliberate attempt to inflict injury to a person’s physical or psychological integrity through brutality, homicide, imprisonment, forced labor, or, it could be argued, any unsafe or poorly paid labor done by people without other options.
These three categories and the concept of structural violence have been developed mostly by Johan Galtung, a pioneer in the field of peace studies. Galtung, the author of many books, is the founder of the International Peace Research Institute and is currently Professor of Peace Studies at the University of Hawaii. He claims that the opposite of peace is not war but, rather, violence. He proposes a much wider than generally accepted understanding of violence as that which violates basic needs, rights and the individual’s intrinsic dignity as, for instance, enumerated in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948.
Structural/cultural violence, whether it be a police policy of racial profiling, a federal government practice of irradiating its citizens in the name of national defense while lying about the consequences, destroying the environment in the service of business interests, or any attitude or action that disenfranchises a particular group of people is violence. It may be subtle and hidden to those benefiting from it, but it is neither to those affected.
According to Galtung, the opposite of peace is violence. And violence always nurtures more violence. Even the greatest of 20th century peacemaker, Mohandas K. Gandhi, recognized that it is better to be violent than powerless, and structural and cultural violence makes people powerless. Peace is the opposite of violence, and the first step towards peace is the dismantling of the structures and cultures of violence, whether they be national, local or individual. Everyone holds or at least knows a piece of those structures that he or she can remove.

WALKING THE LINE, SHROUDED IN DARKNESS

Dr. Carl Gustav Jung held the view that consciousness is “a very recent acquisition of nature.” He described consciousness as “frail, menaced by specific dangers and easily injured.” Jung studied and treated the vulnerabilities of the human psyche, which he saw as encompassing far more than human consciousness and its contents, with the humility and reverence of a man who realized that no man ever “perceives anything fully or comprehends anything completely.” Though many scientists and philosophers deny the existence of what is termed the “unconscious,” Jung considered them naïve, doing nothing more (or less) than expressing “an age-old ‘misoneism’—a fear of the new and the unknown.”
He wrote, “Man has developed consciousness slowly and laboriously, in a process that took untold ages to reach what human hubris terms ‘the civilized state’ (which is arbitrarily dated from the invention of script in about 4000 B.C.). And this evolution is far from complete, for large areas of the human mind are still shrouded in darkness.”
Shrouded in darkness.
As a friend is fond of saying, there you have it.
Shrouded in darkness.
Such dark thoughts arise in these dark international times because it’s not always just the unknown, the unconscious that is shrouded. Several years ago I was discussing nuclear armaments in the world with one of my hawkish friends, a retired military officer. I argued in favor of on-going reduction to elimination of nuclear weaponry among the super powers as the first step to persuading less powerful nations to abandon their nuclear arsenals. It is unreasonable, hypocritical and impractical for any powerful nuclear armed kingdom to ask a weaker nation (India, Pakistan, Israel, Iran, North Korea or shadow nations lacking geographic boundaries or even coordinates) to forego nuclear weaponry. I argued that it is the powerful and strong who set the example by which the weaker model their actions and values. My friend the hawk, his memory of history as well as the foundation of his moral high ground shrouded in darkness, argued that weaker countries couldn’t be trusted but that the U.S., morally superior to and the protector of the rest of the world, could handle being the possessor of superior levels of nuclear weaponry because, among other reasons, “…we would never be the first to use the atomic bomb against another country.”
In the context of a debate between friends, I enjoyed pointing out his invalid argument and reminding him that the U.S. already has been the first to drop an atomic bomb on another country—twice, but that reminder and its larger point was disturbing and not at all enjoyable. His consciousness had completely blocked out the realities of history in the interests of a particular (and popular) military/political/ economic belief system. My friend, an honest man, was good enough to rethink the point and recognize that perception and comprehension are frailer than any political/military/economic dogma would have us believe. None of us ever perceives anything fully or comprehends anything completely. One of the many problems with the linear path of thinking that comprises any dogma (religious, political, social, economic, military or even personal) is that it tends to ignore or relegate to insignificance or the realm of evil whatever is too organic or presumptuous to fit on the line.
However, lines are inherently narrow and, as Gertrude Stein observed so succinctly, “There are no straight lines in nature.”
This includes the nature of man, a far more mysterious, unknown and unpredictable beast than human linear thought can appreciate. Jung, who studied the human mind more than most, pointed out that large areas of that mind are shrouded in darkness. Though for the most part they would have you believe otherwise, this includes the minds of most but not all political, military and economic leaders of the world who are fond of talking if not always walking their particular line.
Walking the line, shrouded in darkness.
How else explain the refusal of the U.S., the largest nuclear nation which sets the standard for the world in all things military, to reduce its nuclear arsenal? Nuclear weapons research and development budget has more than doubled. More than half of the tax dollars U.S. citizens pay to their government goes to the military (mostly to the benefit of ‘the military-industrial complex’) and the U.S. is assigning a larger role to nuclear weapons in its military strategy and expanding the infrastructure of the nuclear weapons complex in America.
Several decades ago Jung wrote that the west has “…begun to realize that the difficulties confronting us are moral problems and that the attempts to answer them by a policy of piling up nuclear arms or by economic ‘competition’ is achieving little, for it cuts both ways.”
And in 2019, this administration, which has never encountered a moral/ethical/practical/real problem it couldn’t spin, ignore or falsify, the bomb continues walking the line, shrouded in darkness.

A LETTER TO ED ABBEY

A LETTER TO ED ABBEY
(Recently found in one of my journals)

May 21, 1989
Aspen, Colorado

Dear Ed Abbey:

Just a few hours ago I returned from a fine three day trip to Moab and its environs, some of your favorite desert land. I’ve been thinking quite a lot about you, your work, your thought, what you meant to me and others and many things about—you—since you died two months ago. That’s not really unusual. I thought a lot about you, and of you, over the years. I even got to tell you something about it in the few exchanges of letters we had several years ago. I’m glad I initiated that exchange and told you how much you helped me and that I was able to recognize and appreciate it. I am grateful that you took the time to reply. I’m sorry we never met and had the chance to get to know each other. I suspect we would not have been in agreement on all things, but I always felt we would have liked each other quite a lot.
What is unusual is that I didn’t know until driving back to Aspen this afternoon that I was going to write this.
I went to Moab on the night of the 18th with my friend Marilyn, who is reading “The Monkey Wrench Gang”, her first Abbey book, which I gave her a couple of weeks ago. She’s a very sexy woman and a great traveling companion and I thought she could use some time in the vast, open desert that you loved and wrote about so well. She’s a divorce case, and you and I know that one all too well, and we both know how a perspective of wide open spaces can be healing to the perspective of the inner spaces. We slept by the Colorado River at Big Bend and the moon was bright.
The morning of the 19th Marilyn and my young climbing friend Joel and I hiked up to Castleton Tower. Joel and I climbed the North Chimney and it was a beautiful climb on a lovely day. The 19th is my youngest son Jason’s birthday. He was 18 and in California and though you are gone and I am going Jason is still coming, and I often wonder about the sort and quality of life that will be his. After the climb Joel, Marilyn and I went to the Pizza Hut in Moab for the salad bar and garlic bread after showering under the leak in the water pipe just off the Castle Valley Road. When we got back to the camp at Big Bend the Mormons had invaded. About 200 BYU students, the rudest, most brain dead, spiritless people sort of alive on earth. The same thing happened to us last year and I wrote a column about them that I called “Locusts in the Desert.” I wish you could have read it. I think you would have laughed and I certainly owe you a few of those. We broke camp and slept on a road near the bridge over the Colorado just north of town. We could hear the trucks and other traffic and it was not a restful night.
Still, we got up early and made it to the May 20th sunrise memorial for Ed Abbey held north of town up a dirt road. I don’t have to tell you what went on there. You were there. I’d never heard of Terry Tempest Williams before, but she is very impressive and her love for you and grief at losing you were powerful reminders of the durability, fragility and uniqueness of each human. She drew up to the surface some deep grief and sorrows and lost loves of my own. She reminded us of the importance of keeping in touch with one another, with those we love and care about. She got that from you and passed it on to us at a memorial gathering for you. Keep in touch.
Ken Slight and Doug Peacock must have been wonderful friends for you to have. They were lucky men to be your friends and they knew it. You were lucky too, and I bet you knew it.
Dave Foreman says Earth First the same way Adolph Hitler said “Lebensraum.” Germany First. I met Foreman a few summers ago up Trail Creek outside Sun Valley in Idaho at an Earth First gathering. He was talking about how his friend Ed Abbey might show up for the meeting, but I didn’t believe him and you never showed up. I don’t know if Foreman and you were friends. I don’t think Earth First represents your spirit or thoughts, but Foreman tried to make of the memorial service for you a rallying call for Earth First. I did not like it, a discordant note to a fitting morning in memory of Ed Abbey. But maybe any proper and loving memorial to you needs to include a discordant note. A part of you enjoyed the fart in polite company. Foreman filled that role, but he smells bad to me.
Ann Zwinger was sweet and bright.
Wendell Berry, like you, is a man of honesty and integrity. He is a model and great artist.
Barry Lopez said it best and I think you would have approved. He has been out and about in the world, listening, observing and talking to people. He said, “The news is heavy, but we are heavier.”
My friend, Burnie Arndt, was there, stopping by on his way back from California where he had buried his sister. After the memorial he said that a lot of feelings were still real close to the surface and the morning was hard for him. Humans can only take so much grief and pain, as you know. I haven’t lost anyone lately, but I had to wipe tears from my eyes and hold back many more (for reasons that are for another writing another time) and the memorial for Ed Abbey was hard, poignant and moving for me as well.
While driving back to Colorado today Marilyn asked me why the memorial service for you touched me so deeply. I didn’t know until she asked me but I knew when she did, and I told her I have a lot of old sorrows that are still in there, and Ed Abbey was a bigger influence and closer to my thought and heart and work than I had realized. I didn’t really feel your death and how much I have lost in your passing until the gathering of your friends and admirers north of Moab yesterday. I know you understand the interconnectedness of all love, all joy, all sorrow. You were a big man, Ed Abbey. Thanks for what I will miss. Thanks for what remains.
Go in peace.

DD