Searching For Simplicity

“A little simplification would be the first step toward rational living, I think.”
Eleanor Roosevelt

A friend recently dropped by for a visit while on a vacation trip of indeterminate length on a search for a simpler life. The bumper sticker on the back of his traveling home on wheels was familiar: “Your worst nightmare is my favorite vacation.” Like so many bon mots this one can be interpreted in more than one way, including that your nightmare and my vacation as well as vice-versa are not separate events. For various reasons involving recent readings and the on going awareness that the health of planet Earth in all areas (water, air, land, human population growth, the growing number of extinct species, global warming, environment in general, etc.) is rapidly deteriorating, it was a reminder to never confuse standard of living with quality of life. All too many people do not differentiate between such two very different realities.
They are as different as the inner life of the heart and mind and the outer landscape of conspicuous consumption, or organic farmer/ citizen of the earth and derivatives trader of its extractive resources, or devoted, skeptical scientist and devout, true believing Creationist. And each can be interpreted in more than one way, including just the opposite of what the standard bearer intends.
The worst nightmare of, for instance, the CEO of any large corporation is that the business of the corporation ceases to grow. At the same time (the present moment), for the earth and all its inhabitants, human and otherwise, the worst nightmare is that the business of corporations continues to grow. The world’s economic model is based on the lurid fantasy of unlimited, endless growth, each increment of which compounds the complexity of life. Simplicity is an alternative, even an antidote to complexity and boundless growth. It can be viewed as a vacation from the prevailing worldview, economic engine and ethic of every multi-national corporation, perhaps best and most famously summed up by Ed Abbey: “Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell.”
Cancer is a nightmare for everyone, it is no one’s favorite vacation and growth for the sake of growth is its ideology. The implications of relentless growth for individual, society and the earth itself are obvious. Author and Senior Lecturer in Leadership and Sustainability at MIT Peter Senge, who was named a ‘Strategist of the Century’ by the Journal of Business Strategy and who describes himself as an ‘idealistic pragmatist’ says of the current state of Earth, “We are sleepwalking into disaster, going faster and faster to get to where no one wants to be.” That is, by 2050 the capacity of the planet to renew itself (clean air, water, arable land, sustainable fisheries and the like) will be 300 to 500 percent beyond sustainability. And there will be 9 billion people struggling (and waging wars against each other) to survive. It is difficult to imagine that there will be much in the way of vacation.
The antidote to sleepwalking into disaster is to wake up and to take a vacation from walking to where no one wants to be. Wake up and take a vacation from the nightmare crisis of complexity caused in large measure by growth for the sake of growth. As every study one can find involving the demographics of both standard of living and quality of life clearly shows the resources supporting both are quickly running out. The problem is enormous—more than 7 billion humans and growing by 50 million a year at this writing—gargantuan enough that one person might understandably feel overwhelmed, helpless, resigned. But Mahatma Gandhi, who had some experience in such matters, pointed out, “In a gentle way, you can shake the world.” You—one person—can take a vacation from and thereby shake off the nightmare. You can shake the world, gently, or, if you prefer, you can let it shake you, perhaps not so gently.
As a place to start I like what Yvon Chouinard, the founder and owner of Patagonia, Inc., says: “I think the simple life really begins with owning less stuff.” Very few, probably none, reading this can say with a straight face that they don’t own too much ‘stuff.’ In a gentle way you can shake the world—and take a vacation from the nightmare of endless consumerism—by nothing more complex than taking, say, ten things you don’t need to the community thrift store. It will put you ten steps closer to a simple life and, gently, help wake up the world.
Give it a try. Those steps might lead to others.

QUESTIONS FROM FRO

Robert “Fro” Frolich was a beloved member of the Squaw Valley/North Lake Tahoe community for many years. When he died in 2010 after a long battle with cancer, the world of mountains and the soul of adventure lost one of its most passionate and articulate spokesmen and chroniclers. His two coffee table books, “Mountain Dreamers: Visionaries of Sierra Nevada Skiing” and “Skiing with Style. Sugar Bowl: 60 Years” are classics. Fro was many things to many people—writer, skier, climber, adventurer, seeker, bon vivant and trusted confidante with huge shoulders. First of all, to me, Fro was my friend, and just after my book “Night Driving” was published he sent me these questions.

Fro: You’ve been pumping out an array of stories for over forty years. Finally, you’ve published a book. It’s about time. What’s been the hold up and is there a novel on the way?
DD: The short answer is that if I had a dollar for every publisher rejection I’ve received I would be able to take that money and fill up my car with gas, drive to Squaw from Ketchum, buy a lift ticket for the day, ski all day with a fine lunch at High Camp, take you out to dinner in Squaw’s best restaurant, fill up my car again and drive back to Ketchum and have a few dollars left over. The long answer is that my writing career, as I once told Mort Lund, “……has been hampered by all the time I spend skiing and climbing and traveling. If it weren’t for the mountains, I think I could become a hell of a good mountain writer.” I’ve got at least two more books worth of material already done that if “Night Driving” proves successful I’ll try to get published. Yes, there is a novel on the way, though it’s still in my brain and not on paper or even in the computer.

Fro: Your writings and your lifestyle have been compared to part Kerouac part Edward Abbey even part Hunter Thompson. Whose actually been a big influence and do you have any Hunter stories?
DD: Well, those three were writing about several issues, experiences and attitudes that interested me and they are among my favorite writers; but I’d been driving long distances around the U.S. long before I became aware of Kerouac, altering my own consciousness long before “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas” was published, and pissed off about the environmental destruction of my homeland before I knew about Abbey. Among the beats, Gary Snyder certainly has long been an influence. Hemingway was such a strong early influence that much of my early work sounds like third rate Hemingway and I had to quit reading him for about 20 years, but now that he’s no longer a threat to my own voice I admire him more than ever. My young influences included Mark Twain, Jack London, Thomas Wolfe (not Tom), John Steinbeck, Scott Fitzgerald, Montaigne, William Blake, Gertrude Stein, Edna St. Vincent Millay and, of all people, Monty Atwater. No, I don’t have any Hunter stories that haven’t already been told.

Fro: Night Driving has long been celebrated as a classic piece of writing. And it has just as much power in its words today as way back yonder when you wrote it. Have we come full circle as a society to still embrace its message?
DD: Society as a whole seems to me as out of control as ever, but every individual can read a book, embrace its message and change some small part of their world that needs changing. There is great hope in that and if “Night Driving” in some small way adds to that hope in action I am pleased.

Fro: You write that our ultimate tragedy, the deepest despair, is to not be who we are. It seems to me you’ve been several different people in your life—athlete, rogue, loadie, Buddhist, etc. Not to be sophomoric, but is there a time and place for truly discovering oneself?
DD: Yes. The time is now. The place is here.

Fro: You write in “A Place To Start” that “…hope is the intention to trust the true nature of things.” Yet so many times we feel despair. We feel hopelessness sometimes whether reading the newspaper or just looking at our own lives. Have you ever had the same feelings and where did you look to start believing again?
DD: Fro, it is a continuous, unending struggle. Joy does not exist without sorrow, nor does life without death. It is the human condition. And, yes, I’ve had my fair share of black holes in life. The great writer and activist Terry Tempest Williams was asked by a conservative U.S. Senator who disagreed with her thoughts about Iraq and other national policies, “What are you willing to die for?” Terry answered, after a great deal of introspection“….that was not the question, it wasn’t what I was willing to die for, but what I was willing to give my life to.” You get out of black holes by figuring out what you are willing to give your life to. What else is there to believe in?

Fro: You’ve hung out and played with some dynamic and groundbreaking people. My favorite friend of yours, of course, was Steve McKinney. Do you have a favorite McKinney story?
DD:  Steve was raised as a McKinney, though biologically he was not. His biological father and mother had divorced when he was young, and the father was estranged from his children and bitter and angry. The parents’ disputes and differences were, as usual, dropped upon the heads and hearts of their children. Steve knew who his father was and even where he was, but he did not know his father. Steve was in his 20s when he decided one night he wanted to contact his biological father who lived on the other side of America and who he had not seen since he was an infant. He phoned. His father told Steve he did not want to have any contact with him and to never phone him again. Steve did not, but he told me he was very hurt, confused and depressed by his father’s response. I asked him what he thought about it, and about his father. His reply took my breath away and has always resonated with me. Steve said, “Well, I know he was doing the best that he could do with what he had to work with at the time.” That’s my favorite Steve McKinney story and how I remember him.

Fro: Who’s the downright craziest skier or climber you ever knew? Was there ever anybody you stayed away from because they were just too weird?
DD: All the real crazies of my era and even of a couple eras after are dead or no longer skiing or climbing. Without mentioning names, yes, there are a few people I avoided (and avoid) for a variety of reasons involving personal taste and self-preservation.

Fro: In today’s ski industry the wooing of “extremism” is so big that no one can deny its influence. Its movement has changed the perception of ski terrain radically. High risk means high pleasure and, though attempting defy-defying acts for most sane folks is tantamount to digesting a bowling bowl, especially Tahoe skiers and boarders, who chase cliffs the way a dog chases tires are called crazy and willing to be hit. Do you think that extremism sends a mixed message to young people out there who think this is what the sport is only about, about going big and skiing sick lines? You were one of the first going big and doing it on huge skis. Does it blow your mind with what’s being skied on the hill these days? What advice do you tell young skiers jumping all these cliffs and skiing such outrageous lines?
DD: To borrow the title of Bode Miller’s fine autobiography which I recommend to every skier of any age, ability and degree of love for the sport, “Go Fast, Be Good, Have Fun.”

Fro: The Lake Tahoe Basin, surrounded by a dozen alpine resorts, and blessed with big mountains complemented by big snowfall, is extreme skiing’s breeding ground. Extreme skiers traveling to Lake Tahoe is comparable to surfers visiting the North Shore of Oahu, or windsurfers making the pilgrimage to Ho’okipa on Maui. Tahoe’s terrain is a rite of passage for the ski or snowboarding enthusiast, especially Squaw Valley. Is Squaw Valley the mother ship for extremists and is it that rite of passage? What are your thoughts?
DD: I probably don’t know enough about modern extreme skiing to make an intelligent comment, but the most extreme skiing and lines I’ve seen have been in Alaska. I was very grateful that I was too old to think that I needed to ski them, though those who do are wild and beautiful adventurers.

Fro: You’ve traveled to some of the most remote places in the world. You probably have more frequent flyer miles than the Rolling Stones. What are some of the most far out places you’ve traveled to? Do all airports look alike or do you have a favorite. Any place you ever went where you should have stayed home?
DD:Kashgar, China; the Rongbuk Valley under the north face of Mt. Everest, Tibet; Mustagh Ata, Pamir Mountains, China; Patagonia, Argentina; the bottom of the Grand Canyon, Arizona; Mt. Steele, Kluane National Park, Yukon, Canada; Yosemite, California before, say, 1975; Lake Tahoe, California/Nevada before, say, 1960; Mt. Shasta, California; Sawtooth Mountains, Idaho; Indian Creek, Utah; the volcanoes of southern Chile. I like airports less and less with every journey and there are no candidates for favorite. Yes, like all people who tend to wander, there are many places I went where I should have stayed home, but I didn’t know that until I got home.

Fro: After decades of being on your skis you appear to not have slowed down. How many days per season do you still “boot up”? Skiing is your lifeblood. Has it ever felt like a job or does the love for the sport continue to increase every day?
DD: I ski nearly every day all winter, though often for only a couple of hours; between the lift served mountain in Sun Valley and the backcountry I probably ski 120 to 140 days a year. Like most skiers, I began skiing for the joy of it; then it turned into a competitive endeavor; and then to a professional one; and now it is back to being what it was in the beginning. Yes, it has been a job at times, but my love and appreciation for skiing continues to grow.

Fro: The ski industry has jettisoned itself from a rather fringe sport into big business fueled by corporate takeover and real estate. It’s a far fling from the days of staying at the Heatherbed in Aspen Highlands or The Star Hotel in Truckee. However, the ski industry as a whole continues to move from independent ownership to a structure fueled by corporate takeover and real estate. Has there been anything lost in the transition of free enterprise? What are some of the good and maybe some of the bad directions taking place in today’s snowsport industry?
DD: Think of the principle that guides a community, and think of the principal who guides a corporation. Think of a privately owned cattle ranch with meadows that have supported cattle for a hundred years, and think of a CAFO.

Fro: Reading “Europe: Fourth Time Around” made me laugh and cry. Those were great days. Adversely, do you think skiing has lost its soul, its on-slope experience? KT-22 on a powder morning has one of the worst vibes full of grommets, poseurs and gapers jostling in liftline. What are people’s anxieties about these days? In general, what’s everybody so stressed about? We are living in mountain paradise in a wonderful community amongst groovetron folks. Why are people so upset? Are people just as tweaked in the mountains and need counseling as in the urban areas?
DD: Beats me what the people you’re talking about need, but it’s a shame they can’t get it. The business of skiing has lost its soul, but the experience of skiing and the skiers who tune into it have not. The basics never change in skiing or anything else.

Fro: That looked like a really cool camper that you hung out in while writing your essays at Camp 4. Whatever happened to that rig?
DD: I bought that from my friend Louis Bergeron (now a doctor in Elko) for two pairs of skis, drove it for a few years and sold it to a gentleman (I’ve forgotten his name) who was into restoring old vehicles. I like to think the old Chevy is still on the road at old car reunions, full of soul and good karma.

Fro: If there is one thing to take on the road what is it? Peanut Butter, Bible, Swiss Army knife, Six Mix-A-Lot CDs? And what is the one indispensable thing you take with you when you’re doing big walls. (Dave Nettle once told me a headlamp as example).
DD: On the road take good coffee; on a wall take a pair of prusiks.

Fro: Does it ever blow your mind about what a long strange trip it’s been? What is your favorite testimonial to Tahoe and what does Squaw Valley mean to you in the big canvas of things?
DD: Yes. Didn’t you read “Night Driving?” I grew up at Tahoe and grew up some more in Squaw, and, to pursue the big canvas metaphor, Tahoe and Squaw are the undercoating to everything.

Fro: Do you have a favorite anecdote from a moment through the years that puts your lifelong efforts into perspective; funny, humbling? Is there a moral to all this?
DD: If there is it was summed up in “Europe: Fourth Time Around” by Emile Allais when he laughed and laughed while sitting in the snow after a fall and said, “Oh, it’s good for us to fall down every now and then,” and he laughed some more.

Fro: Bonus Question: What’s your favorite line at Squaw Valley?
DD: The Nose, the West Face, the East Face, Chute 75 in powder were my favorites, but I haven’t skied Squaw in several years.

The Unsinkable Titanic

Titanic. Everyone has heard of the British luxury liner of that name which sank in 13,000 feet of water about 400 miles south of Newfoundland on the night of April 14-15, 1912. The Titanic was on its way to New York City from Southampton, England when it struck an iceberg and, in less than three hours, sank.
Because of the most modern and clever technology and industry with which it was built, the Titanic was considered unsinkable. It was the largest, most luxurious ship afloat and designed so that it could never sink. Everyone said so.
After
April 15, 1912 everyone quit saying so but by then it was too late. About 1500 people sank with the ship or died in the water. The water was cold. And deep. The rich and famous and wise and good died as easily and ignominiously as the poor and unknown and foolish and venal. The courageous and the cowardly went down side by side. About 700 people survived with memories of a night they would never forget.
Perhaps there were none more foolish than those in command of the Titanic who knew icebergs lay in the waters ahead, but who chose not to alter course to avoid them. After all, everyone said the ship was unsinkable and a mere, if natural, chunk of ice was not considered significant enough to change the path of the latest marvel of the technological/industrial age. The more than 2200 passengers and crew ate, slept, drank champagne, danced, loved, argued and both celebrated and anguished over the small and large details of their lives, all the time encapsulated in a technological bubble called Titanic. Outside that thin sac of steel, however, lay the biologic world in which all things are connected and where nothing is unsinkable.
It has been many years since I first heard of the unsinkable ship Titanic used as a parable for the biologic life of the good ship Earth. It came from a Zen Buddhist teacher during a talk about human relationship with the rest of the natural world and how far out of balance this relationship has become because of man’s dependence on technology. He had seen the film “Titanic” on a flight to
Poland, a country with some of the worst industrial pollution on earth. He said the film reminded him of modern man’s blind, addictive reliance on his own technology that is steering earth to the brink of biologic collapse.
The technologies of humankind have superseded and are destroying the technologies of Earth’s biological communities at an alarming rate. These communities give and maintain all life on earth, including that of man’s own technologies.
Such unbounded confidence in man’s technology combined with the human lack of capacity for connection with (and respect for) the natural world has been called “autistic” by Thomas Berry, the American writer, historian, teacher and Catholic monk.
Berry says, “My own description of what has happened is that my generation has been autistic. My generation has been so locked into itself that it was totally without any capacity for rapport with the natural world. My generation could not get outside itself and the outer world could not get in. There was a total barrier between the human and non-human. This is what needs to be explained. This autism did not begin with modern centuries.”
Indeed, it did not. The evolution of mankind’s moral sense has developed over thousands of years and it has arrived at a curious and dangerous place.
Berry says, “We have a moral sense of suicide, homicide and genocide, but no moral sense of biocide or geocide, the killing of the life systems and even the killing of the earth.”
Berry, so far as I know, was the first major thinker to use the image of the Titanic to describe life on earth today. In a talk entitled “Ethics and Ecology,” given at Harvard University in April 1996 Berry said, “What happened to that ‘unsinkable’ ship is a kind of parable for us since only in the most dire situation do we have the psychic energy needed to examine our way of acting on the scale that is now required. The daily concerns of the ship and its passengers needed to be set aside for a more urgent concern for the well being of the ship itself. Microphase concerns needed to give way to a macrophase issue. So now there was a need to recognize that the planet Earth is threatened in its survival by our industrial economy. Already the well-being and basic functioning of the planet in its air, its water, its soil and its basic life systems have been so disrupted that a biologist as extensively acquainted with the life functioning of the planet as Peter Raven of the Missouri Botanical Gardens has addressed scientific groups under the title “We Are Killing the Earth.”
Pursuing the Titanic theme,
Berry referred to a paper signed by over a thousand of the world’s most illustrious scientists entitled “A Warning to Humanity. The introduction states: ‘Human beings and the Natural World are set on a collision course. If not checked, many of our current practices put at serious risk the future that we wish for human society and the plant and Animal Kingdoms, and may so alter the living world that it will be unable to sustain life in the manner that we know.’”
The captains of our industrial/technological civilization would be wise to change course. There are icebergs ahead.

 

The World Clock

“Happiness belongs to those who are sufficient unto themselves. For all external sources of happiness are, by their own nature, highly uncertain, precarious, ephemeral, and subject to chance.”
Arthur Schopenhauer

Everyone who spends much time on the internet has favorite sites. One of mine is called World Clock, one aspect of a larger web site presented by Peter Russell who has been and is perhaps best described as “Eco-Philosopher Extraordinaire.” He is also a businessman/self-help guru who, through his web site, will sell you books, tapes, DVDs, meditation instruction and speaking engagements to help you find happiness as described by Arthur Schopenhauer. As such, Peter Russell is not for everyone.
But the World Clock is, and I check it out about once a month just to monitor some of the changes in our highly uncertain, precarious world.
World clock presents approximate data continuously updated by the second, day, week, month and year about a wide range of the earth’s dynamics, including its human population, species extinction, shrinking forests, expanding desertification, CO2 emissions and military expenditures. The clock gives concrete numbers to many of those highly uncertain, precarious and ephemeral and subject to chance sources that, whether or not we pay attention to them, affect our individual happiness and the collective lives of all creatures that live on earth. Like everything in this world, including each and every person reading this, the data and the dynamics they represent are inextricably connected.
At this writing, according to the clock, there are about 7 billion 116 million humans on planet earth with 170,000 more arriving each day. Almost 70,000 acres of forest are leveled each day and another 32,000 acres become desert. Each day, day after day after day. You can watch in real, present time the average temperature of the planet, and that figure never fluctuates, it only raises a miniscule amount every second. Hardly enough to notice (and all too many people don’t) until one realizes there are 315,576,000 seconds in ten years, and then those miniscule amounts noticeably add up.
One disturbing if interesting and surprising (at least to me) statistic from the clock is that each year more than 110,000 people commit suicide, more than the numbers of loss of life to war and all the other less organized forms of violence combined, at least for this year. During our nation’s search for phantom weapons of mass destruction in
Iraq, for instance, loss of life to war numbers were considerably higher. There are more than 4.5 million new automobiles produced each year and more than 150,000 people are killed in traffic accidents. There are almost 14 million bicycles built each year. The clock doesn’t report how many people are killed and injured riding those bicycles, but it can be surmised that a significant percentage of bike riders are sufficient unto themselves and whose happiness belongs to them. At least compared to drivers of the automobile, especially, say, those in a southern California freeway gridlock where happiness is not the prevailing state of mind.
One of the most fascinating, unhappy items on the clock is “Military Expenditure.” The numbers in each time frame from day to year change so fast the human eye cannot keep up. These expenditures are not broken down by country, but every responsible
U.S. citizen knows that the U.S. spends more on military than the next ten nations—China, Russia, UK, Japan, France, Saudi Arabia, India, Germany, Italy and Brazil‑‑‑combined. Combined!! The U.S. accounts for more than 40 percent of the world’s military expenditures, paid for by nearly 50 percent of the U.S. budget. When you see the military expenditure numbers on the world clock moving faster than the eye can follow, it is useful to consider that 40 percent of those whirling numbers represent your tax dollars at work (or war or waste, depending on perspective). At this writing, the whirling military numbers were reporting just under 5 trillion (TRILLION!!!) dollars a week. This indicates that every week of every year more than 2 trillion dollars of your taxes are spent supporting what the U.S. military is doing in the world. Two trillion dollars a week.
The thought arises from contemplating such data that even, say, half a trillion dollars every week could be put to better use in America than it has been in, for specific instance, Iraq, Afghanistan or Pakistan. We could start with a health care system, the infrastructure of road and water systems or mass rapid transit systems. Personally, I would favor using that money for education. The
U.S., which spends more on the military than any nation in history, is today ranked 54th among nations in education expenditures. And it shows. The U.S. is ranked 17th among world nations in education. Idaho, where I live, is ranked 47th in education among states in the 17th ranked Unites States. The implications are obvious. The possibilities are as vast as the data on the World Clock.
Check it out at www.peterrussell.com

Seven Billion Gorillas in the Garden (but don’t talk about them)

There are many advocacy groups that have an influence on the American west and elsewhere. Each of them has its adherents and critics, and some of them actually contribute to the benefit or harm of the planet and its inhabitants. That is, at some level they are effective. Among the groups that come to (my) mind are: Sierra Club, Wise Use Movement, Smart Growth, National Rifle Association, Idaho Rivers United, The Aluminum Association, Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Wyoming State Snowmobile Association, Planned Parenthood, National Right to Life Committee, Snake River Alliance and the Pacific Logging Congress. There are others too numerous to mention, and every person could easily make a different list.
I oppose the tenets of half the groups listed and am in favor of most of those of the other half, but all of them neglect what Professor Chris Rapley, Director of the British Antarctic Survey, terms the “Cinderella” issue of the environmental debate, so called because its implications are so controversial that no one is comfortable raising it. The issue is that more than 7 billion evolved descendants of gorillas who we call human beings live on planet earth; About 50 million new people arrive each year. The U.S. is the fastest growing industrialized country on earth, expanding at a rate of 58,000 additional people a week or about 3 million a year. The earth, the original mythic Garden of Eden with its finite and diminishing resources, is not expanding and cannot support this many people.
This is neither new nor difficult to access or process information. It’s just that, like sex in a Puritan society, homosexuality in a macho/red neck one, or the lies of the majority of world leaders and their corporate masters in every country in polite ones, it’s a distressing topic that raises so many other issues that it’s easier to pretend it isn’t there. This, of course, as the pop adage has it, is like ignoring the 500 pound Silverback gorilla sitting on the kitchen table.
Thomas Malthus, among the first to address the obvious, wrote in 1798, “It is an obvious truth, which has been taken notice of by many writers, that population must always be kept down to the level of the means of subsistence; but no writer that the Author recollects has inquired particularly into the means by which this level is effected: and it is a view of these means which forms, to his mind, the strongest obstacle in the way to any very great future improvement of society. He hopes it will appear that, in the discussion of this interesting subject, he is actuated solely by a love of truth, and not by any prejudices against any particular set of men, or of opinions. He professes to have read some of the speculations on the future improvement of society in a temper very different from a wish to find them visionary, but he has not acquired that command over his understanding which would enable him to believe what he wishes, without evidence, or to refuse his assent to what might be unpleasing, when accompanied with evidence.”
When Malthus wrote those words there were about one billion humans on earth, just over 5 million of them in America. In 1950 there were two and a half billion of us. In about 40 years it is expected that nine and a half billion humans will live on earth. That is several billion more than “the level of the means of subsistence.”
The phrase “Don’t Californicate Colorado” was popularized at one time by Coloradoans who got there first. Similar sentiments are expressed every day (with understandable reason) in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Wyoming, Washington, Oregon and Arizona, among others. The Minuteman Project and the Yuma Patrol are civilian groups devoted to keeping Latin Americans from illegally entering the U.S. Such “gated” community/state/nation solutions to over population cannot and do not work.
Rapley estimates that over the long haul the earth can reasonably support between 2 and 3 billion people at what he calls “a good standard of living.” He means that the 500 pound Silverback gorilla really weighs 1500 pounds and is moving down the table to see if there’s any food at the other end. All the sound and fury of the advocacy and activist groups mentioned are the sounds of the table breaking.
Meanwhile, as mentioned, 76 million new people arrive at the breaking breakfast table every year.

Thinking of Louis Armstrong

Louis Armstrong. Satchmo. A trumpet played with a sound like no other. An inimitable singing voice resonating life, joy, humor and strength. An improvisational genius of jazz. The name, the nickname, the horn, the voice and the artistic imagination would never be mistaken for anyone besides the man we know as Louis Armstrong.
His music is an integral part of the fabric of American life and culture. As with many Americans and jazz fans from all over the world, Armstrong has been a presence in my life for as long as I can remember. In many ways he is the quintessential American icon, part myth, part legend, completely human and as vital as a heartbeat.
Sometimes his music arrives in the mind while I’ve been working early in the morning or late at night. In that peculiar way of all music and genius musicians particularly, the sound of Louis Armstrong loosens the imagination, warms the heart, and entices the mind to wander into memory and away from the task at hand. Whether this phenomenon contributes to or damages the work in progress is, maybe, something to consider; but it is unquestionable that the music of Louis Armstrong enhances the lives of his listeners.
Though Armstrong died in 1971, I use the present tense because, in truth, the music never dies. His music speaks to the present moment as clearly and with as much vitality as the day it was played.
I saw Armstrong in concert several times in the 1950s and 1960s in the casinos of Reno and Lake Tahoe where I grew up. Until the early 1960s the only black people allowed in the majority of Nevada casinos were entertainers like Armstrong and his band, and they were only allowed on stage and in the dressing rooms.
Since my father was the manager of the New China Club, the only casino in Reno that allowed black people to spend their money within its doors at that time, the subject of racial inequality, prejudice and injustice was familiar to me. An audience of raucous white people (myself included) paying homage to and being entertained by the great Louis Armstrong in a segregated Nevada casino was a twisted, undelicious irony.
He wouldn’t have been allowed to join his own audiences in Nevada to see, say, Frank Sinatra on the same stages. This beautiful man with black skin gave his all in every performance to every audience, black and white and tan. If he resented the racism of his country, it didn’t show through his smile and his music and his song.
Armstrong wasn’t an angry black man, a social activist or even critic. He was the greatest jazz trumpet player of his time, a happy conjunction of talent and soul. His distinctive rough, hoarse singing voice was part of his personality but, in fact, was caused by polyps on his vocal cords. It was his infectious spirit in combination with talent and soul, personality and polyps that made him a major influence in the evolution of jazz, American entertainment and the culture of the world. Armstrong was as American as America gets.
He even made a connection with the world of skiing.
There exists a silly but happy photograph taken in Sun Valley of Armstrong on skis with Andrel Molterer, Roger Staub, Dieter Grieser, Pepi Gramshammer and Stein Eriksen. Armstrong is the dominant person in the group, and it is his smile that stands out among these pale face/Aryan/Nordic grinners. Sun Valley is a long way from the New Orleans ghetto of Storyville where he grew up in the Coloured Waifs’ Home where he learned the rudiments of his music.
One of my associations with Armstrong’s music is with skiing in Italy. In the competition days I was dining in a small restaurant in a village in the Italian Alps and feeling the weight of competitive expectation, the alienation of being the lone American competing against a bevy of Europeans on their turf within their culture trying with inconsistent success to speak their languages, and feeling the will of toughness and constancy dribble away into homesickness and longing for the familiar.
Louis Armstrong’s music began playing over the restaurant loudspeakers. Satchmo’s horn and voice and spirit spoke to me in that little restaurant. Armstrong chased my blues away and allowed my resolve to come back home to my mind where it belongs. Hearing Louis Armstrong in that restaurant was like having a paragraph of encouragement and a good joke from a best friend and advisor at just the right time.
The music of Louis Armstrong has been a friend and balm for the spirit on more than one occasion. In this I am not alone.
Armstrong worked incessantly his entire life, playing his last gig two months before he died. He was a lifelong smoker of the dreaded marijuana, he married three times and he was probably one of the earliest of American draft dodgers.
It is likely that the generally accepted myth of his birth date of July 4, 1900, is a fabrication. His parents were illiterate and many people without birthdays chose July 4th at that time. He was probably born in 1898, though not on July 4, and he would have lied about his age to avoid the draft in World War I.
He had music to play, not wars to fight, and, though the man is gone and the wars are history, the music never dies.

Wildlife Oxymoronics

     “The enemies of the wild are the abundant and ever-multiplying forms of human control…..Many forms of control are dangerous to the wild, from cadastral maps, bureaucracy, statistics, surveillance, biotechnology, and nanotechnology to social engineering and scientific management…..to the mass production of game species, an intellectual move that laid the foundations of modern wildlife management (an oxymoron).”
Jack Turner

Wildlife management is an oxymoron, one of many, including serious fun, common sense, fighting for peace and Creation Science that modern civilization blithely uses to obscure reality and the personal and public costs and consequences of its out of control, obsessive, even psychotic need to control the uncontrollable and understand the unknowable. A couple of years ago western wildlife oxymoronics were showcased when the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildlife Services and/or the Idaho Department of Fish and Game hired a helicopter for an undisclosed sum of taxpayers dollars. The helicopter was installed with an undisclosed number of “aerial gunners” who were paid an undisclosed amount of taxpayer dollars to fly around north-central Idaho on a mission to shoot and kill wolves from the air “…in an effort to protect elk herds.”
After an undisclosed number of hours of flying time the aerial gunners managed to kill five wolves. Idaho Department of Fish and Game Deputy Director Jim Unsworth announced that the hunt was being suspended indefinitely because it was “inefficient and expensive.” He said the wolves are in thick timber which makes them difficult to shoot from the air. Unsworth told the Lewiston Tribune, “The elk and deer are on green-up down low and the wolves are there with them. They are in that lower-elevation, big-timber kind of stuff. We can find the packs, but you can’t find the wolves to do anything from a control standpoint.”
‘From a control standpoint’ is an interesting phrase. If ‘you’ can’t find the wolves to do anything then there is no point of control to stand on. Maybe ‘you’ who can’t find the wolves should check in with ‘we’ who can find the packs where the wolves, by definition and practice, hang out. Every report, justification or rationale for killing wolves that I’ve seen is always filled with interesting phrases, some oxymoronic, others just colorful, opaque, incomplete, misleading and, on occasion, unreal, and they always raise more questions than they answer. Even people like myself who view the term ‘wildlife management’ as an oxymoron and are not in favor of shooting wolves, especially at taxpayer expense, appreciate and ponder such colorful language as “The elk and deer are on green-up down low and the wolves are there with them. They are in that lower-elevation big timber kind of stuff.”
One obvious question: didn’t the Idaho Department of Fish and Game know the wolves they couldn’t find were in that lower-elevation big timber kind of stuff? If not, why not? Isn’t it the job of Fish and Game in their oxymoronic role of managing wildlife to know that wolves favor that big timber kind of stuff and that to a healthy wolf’s ears the sound of a helicopter is as loud as its inefficiency and expense to the taxpayer, from a control standpoint? For those people who enjoy the thrill of killing defenseless wildlife from the air, it must have been a great hooah experience at taxpayer’s expense, but, as is so often the case from a control standpoint those hooah moments are inefficient and expensive.
It’s simply not true that “…you can’t find the wolves to do anything from a control standpoint.” At least five wolves were found and killed, and, from a control standpoint, it would be an interesting and revealing exercise in accountability to determine the cost of killing each wolf.
The contention that the inefficient and expensive wolf killings were carried out “…in an effort to protect the elk herds,” is, at best, incomplete, and, at worst, misleading. Wolves and elk existed as wild creatures for thousands of years on this continent in an unmanaged natural (and wild) balance between predator and prey in which elk herds are kept healthy by wolves dining on the old, the weak, the lame and the slow. Without human ‘management’ they would continue with their wild, natural dynamic. Everyone who has looked into it, or even thought a bit about it, knows that the biggest dangers to elk are loss of habitat due to human encroachment on their natural territory and hunting of elk by those same humans.
Most of the elk habitat loss is due to real estate development and the public lands welfare sheep and cattle ranching industry which each year loses a miniscule number of their flocks and herds to wolves. And hunting is a big business. Killing wolves on taxpayer dollars is not done to protect elk herds from being killed by wolves, but, rather, to eliminate competition for killing those elk herds so that the wolves’ fellow predator, man, will have more elk to kill. It is also done to placate the strong political lobby of the cattle and sheep industry.
Aerial gunners in helicopters or ground troops on foot (or on 4 wheelers, or trucks) are not killing wolves at government expense to protect elk or any other wildlife. They are the hired guns of industry. Those amateur sportsmen who kill wolves for sport turn the word sport into an oxymoron.

Me and Ed: Remembering a man I never met but felt I knew

In late January 1963 I was in Sun Valley, Idaho. A recent college graduate, I was a 24 year old ski racer who didn’t seem to quite fit into mainstream America. Through a friendship with Ron Funk, who cared even less about the fit than me, I found myself committed to one of the more audacious ski adventures of my life, running the Diamond Sun down Sun Valley’s Bald Mountain. As I wrote in The Straight Course, “The Diamond Sun may be the most difficult standard race in the world. It is the fastest I know of and starts on top of Bald Mountain and finishes at the Wood River 2 3/5 miles below. The route is any way possible down Ridge, Rock Garden, Canyon and River Run.” The Diamond Sun had been run only twice since WWII and is fast, dangerous and scary, and I was appropriately cognizant of this reality.
I mean, the night before the race I was scared shitless, filled with doubts about myself and whether I had what it takes and, more, whether it mattered that I address those personal doubts and questions. In order to relax and take my mind off such heavy toil, my friend Mike Brunetto and I went to the movie showing in Ketchum that night. The film, Lonely Are the Brave with Kirk Douglas and Walter Matthau, is, in my view, the best work Douglas ever did and is one of my all time favorite films. Among other things, it touches on the integrity of personal freedom and the freedom of personal integrity and the price one might pay for them.
At any rate, the film touched and inspired me and added a sliver of resolve to my scared shitless mind and spirit. The next morning we ran the Diamond Sun and everything went flawlessly for me. I set a new record (which still stands as the race hasn’t been run since) of 2:21.0 for the 2 3/5 mile course. A fine memory of a good time, and I always thought of Lonely Are the Brave as an integral part of it. More important, the race gave me the confidence I needed to go to Chile the following summer with the intention of setting a world record for speed on skis.  We went to Chile and set a record and that experience changed my life in myriad ways including better self-knowledge and the doors that open with a world record on the resume that would remain closed without it. The expanded awareness of my own human capabilities helped form much of my life and activities, including the writing, and, more important, the same commitment to writing as a path in life as dangerous and scary as the Diamond Sun, though slower of pace. Some of the doors that opened I probably shouldn’t have walked through, but self-knowledge is a process, not an accomplishment.
A few years later (1971) I began writing for Skier’s Gazette which a year later became Mountain Gazette and which eventually led to my work being published elsewhere. Mountain Gazette was as crucial to my writing as the Diamond Sun had been to my skiing.
By the early ‘70s I had read Desert Solitaire a couple of times and knew that Ed Abbey was a great writer and, in some ways, the spokesman of our times. I read his occasional pieces in MG and was impressed when then editor Mike Moore told me that Abbey sent his contributions in accompanied by a check to help out the struggling publication. Since MG paid me for my work I was grateful to Abbey for more than his fine writing, vision and personal integrity. When MG published my long essay/memoir Night Driving in 1975 it took up most of the issue except for a wonderful Abbey piece about desert driving, and I was thrilled to see my name with his on the cover. Good stuff.
That same year Abbey’s The Monkey Wrench Gang was published. It is a very good novel that resonated with a large segment of America that didn’t quite fit into the mainstream and it nurtured all but the most pesticide sprayed imaginations. After I read it I gave it away as Christmas gifts. I was living between Truckee and Squaw Valley at the time and my neighbors, two New Jersey hippies whose son went to school with my son Jason, were among the recipients. A spacey friend of theirs was visiting from the east coast that winter and one snowstorm morning I went over to my neighbors’ home for a coffee. The spacey friend’s grin wouldn’t leave his face as he thanked me for giving The Monkey Wrench Gang to his hosts, and then he told me about his previous day. He had spent most of the day and into the night reading Abbey’s paean to the purposeful destruction of eyesores and pavement and machines that destroy the earth. He finished the book at 1 a.m. and was inspired to immediate action. Perhaps other, less literary influences were at play as well, but despite the late hour and the storm he hopped on a bicycle with a huge bow saw and rode the 3 or 4 miles to the freeway near Truckee and, under the cover of darkness and the storm, spent a couple of hours dropping a huge, offensive-looking, wood-supported billboard advertising one of the local ski areas. Then he rode the bicycle back home. He had taken Hayduke’s credo to heart (and action): “My job is to save the fucking wilderness. I don’t know anything else worth saving.”
The dropping of the eyesore billboard was the first eco-revolutionary act that I knew of in the Tahoe area, and though I was only one of a few who knew who had done it, I was only one of many who were amused, informed and inspired by it. Life went on and I read more Abbey and rightly thought of him as a giant literary and environmental and thereby societal influence of our time.
And then, some 20 years after the Diamond Sun, I was browsing in a book store and came across an Ed Abbey novel I didn’t know about entitled The Brave Cowboy. A quick glance showed that it was the basis of the film Lonely Are the Brave. The novel is really good. I was and am amazed that I hadn’t put the two together, but knowledge, self and otherwise, is a process, not an accomplishment. A bit of research expanded my awareness that Dalton Trumbo had written the screenplay for the film, and if ever a Hollywood writer type could be a soul-brother to Ed Abbey it was Dalton Trumbo.
I was bemused and informed and once again reminded of the ever present connections and influences, known and unknown, that permeate all our lives, and I promptly wrote Abbey a letter of praise and thanks for his contribution to my life. He graciously answered and reiterated the worth and power of the written word and encouraged me to continue writing. We agreed to meet up sometime, somewhere in the southwest desert, but it never happened and so like most of his fans I have the easy privilege of remembering and thinking of him through the greatness of his work, unencumbered by the rough edges of his person and the inevitable objections I have to some of his ideas.
Ed Abbey died in March 1989. As he requested, Abbey was buried illegally in a spot in the Cabeza Prieta desert of Arizona known only to his friends who buried him, Doug Peacock, Jack Loeffler, Tom Cartwright and Steve Prescott. It is reported that a large quantity of beer and hard booze accompanied the burial, some of it poured on the grave to help Ed on his way. In May of that year a public memorial for Abbey was held near Arches National Monument outside Moab, Utah. The day before the service a friend and I climbed Castleton Tower in Castle Valley. It was May 19, my son Jason’s 18th birthday and I sat on top thinking that both Jason and Ed Abbey would have enjoyed the view from there. The next day we attended the memorial which was wonderful, moving and appropriate. Barry Lopez, Ann Zwinger, Doug Peacock and Dave Foreman were among those who gave beautiful eulogizes for Ed that day. Wendell Berry, who never met Abbey, recited a poem, calling him to Berry’s native Kentucky:

The old oak wears new leaves.
It stands for many lives.
Within its veil of green
A singer sings unseen.
Again the living come
To light, and are at home.
And Edward Abbey’s gone…

I think of that dead friend
Here where he never came
Except by thought and name:
I praise the joyous rage
That justified his page
He would have like this place
Where spring returns with solace
Of bloom in a dark time,
Larkspur and columbine.
The flute song of the thrush
Sounds in the underbrush.

But for me the most moving, astonishing speaker at Abbey’s service on May 20, 1989 was a woman whose name I had never heard and whose work I had never read. Her name was Terry Tempest Williams and she spoke of her long hikes and talks with Ed in the Utah desert and of the importance of friendships and connections and the environment. Terry ended her talk by whipping out some post cards and waving them like a baton, intoning “Keep in touch. Keep in touch. Keep in touch. Keep in touch.” With friends, with connections, with the environment. I was so impressed with Terry that I tracked down her work and have kept up on it ever since. As mentioned, knowledge is a process, not an accomplishment. As are awareness, friends, connections, the environment, work, life, the joyous rage, staying in touch. Thanks, Ed, for that and much more.

Wovoka’s Ghost Dance Still Rolls

 

Native American prophets and holy men have long troubled the uneasy conscience of the modern culture of North America. These native sages have played a larger part in the conscious and unconscious lives of the people of North America than is generally recognized. A few of them, like Lame Deer and Rolling Thunder are known at least by name to the general public, though exactly what they had to say is less familiar. While Western prophets envision Armageddon at the end of the (literal) line, native prophets see a circle, an endless process in which the past and future are alive in the present. It is worth contemplating that combining a straight line and a circle results in a spiral.
One native prophet of great interest is Wovoka, a member of the Paiute nation. He is thought to have been born in 1856 near
Carson City, Nevada and died in 1932. Wovoka was also known as Jack Wilson. By the time of his birth European settlers in Nevada had destroyed the Paiute nation and way of life. Native American nations throughout the continent had been stripped of their lands and traditions, the buffalo had been slaughtered and their peoples were herded onto reservations. All that was left to most of these peoples were their world view, their spiritual beliefs and their medicine men, many of whom, in desperation and sadness, were trying to dream the white man out of existence.
Because of a dream, Wovoka had a profound, lasting and tragic impact on the course of the relationship between the European immigrants and the Native American. During a full eclipse on New Year’s Day of 1889, Wovoka had a dream which resulted in what came to be known as the “Ghost Dance” among Native Americans. Like most Paiutes of that time, he had considerable exposure to the Christian faith of the settlers, and his dream was a mixture of native and Christian beliefs. In his dream, Wovoka died and an eagle carried him to the sky; when he returned alive, he said something like this: “When the Sun died, I went up to heaven and saw God and all the people who had died a long time ago. God told me to come back and tell my people they must be good and love one another, and not fight, or steal or lie. He gave me this dance to give to my people.”
In a short time, Wovoka’s message and dance had spread from
Nevada to the plains Indians, particularly the Lakota Sioux of Pine Ridge, South Dakota.
The ritualistic dance lasted four and five days, and was deeply appealing to Native peoples whose world view and spiritual traditions were based on nature and who were mystified by what Robert Toledo termed “the pew-bound protocol of Christian faiths.” Though Wovoka clearly and consistently spoke against violence in any form, the Ghost Dance was turned into a militaristic ritual by the Lakota. Whatever the effect on Lakota people of non-stop dancing for days at a time, white settlers, mostly as a result of newspaper reports of savage natives dancing themselves into a pagan and violent trance, were terrified. Blame for the situation fell on Wovoka, who was in
Nevada and opposed to violence, and Sitting Bull, the Lakota chief medicine man, who was apathetic to the Ghost Dance. Nevertheless, Sitting Bull was killed on December 15, 1890 in a botched attempt by government officials to arrest him and stop the Ghost Dance.
Fourteen days later, unable to stop the Ghost Dance,  the U.S. Army slaughtered 290 mostly unarmed mostly women and children Lakotas on the frozen plains of Wounded Knee on the Pine Ridge reservation. Thirty-three soldiers died, mostly from friendly fire; 20 Medals of Honor were presented to soldiers with the courage to massacre women and children. Because of Wovoka’s dream,
Wounded Knee became the predominant symbol of America’s brutality toward its first people. It also stopped the Ghost Dance.
In 1971 Rolling Thunder, a Cherokee and Shoshone shaman, said, “People should treat their own bodies with respect. It’s the same thing with the earth. Too many people don’t know that when they harm the earth they harm themselves, nor do they realize that when they harm themselves they harm the earth.”
Lame Deer, a 20th century Sioux shaman, said several years ago, perhaps presciently, “…in my vision the electric light will stop sometime. It is used too much for TV and going to the moon. The day is coming when nature will stop the electricity. Police without flashlights, beer getting hot in the refrigerators, planes dropping from the sky, even the President can’t call up somebody on the phone. A young man will come, or men, who’ll know how to shut off the electricity. It will be painful, like giving birth. Rapings in the dark, winos breaking into the liquor stores, a lot of destruction. People are being too smart, too clever; the machine stops and they are helpless, because they have forgotten how to make do without the machine. There is a Light Man coming, bringing a new light. It will happen before this century is over. The man who has this power will do good things too—stop all atomic power, stop wars, just by shutting the white electro-power off. I hope to see this, but then I’m also afraid. What will be will be…….I’m trying to bring the Ghost Dance back, but interpret it in a new way. I think it has been misunderstood, but after 80 years I believe that more and more people are sensing what we meant when we prayed for a new earth and that now, not only the Indians, but everybody has became an endangered species. So let the Indians help you bring on a new earth without pollution or war. Let’s roll up the world. It needs it.”
Yes, it does.

 

Muffin Recipe

3 bananas/thoroughly mashed

1 egg

1/8 to ¼ cup olive oil

2 dashes cinnamon

1 teaspoon vanilla

1 dollop (or, perhaps, a bit more, depending on taste) molasses

1 cup maple syrup (grade B is best)

¾ cup oats

2 tablespoons millet

1 ¾ cups flour (spelt/whole wheat)

2 cups skim milk

3 cups bran

1 teaspoon salt

1 ½ tablespoon baking powder

(bran and milk go in last)

mix thoroughly

bake at 375 F for 25 to 35 minutes